• jsveiga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two way roads.

    If they didn’t exist today and someone came up with the brilliant idea of having people in control of machines (cars or bikes) moving in opposite directions at 50mph, separated by a few feet and a painted line, it would be dismissed immediately.

    • Robertej92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I drive on a lot of rural roads in the UK, mainly Wales, most of the time I’m just happy when the road has space for two cars to squeeze through and some visibility for what’s coming around the corner of that rural lane. Actual physical lines separating the lanes? Oh boy it’s my birthday. Yet with all that, we have a death rate per 100 million miles of just over a third of somewhere like the US, so I’d imagine the size of cars and inadequate licence requirements are probably bigger issues for road safety

      • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t remember which episode it was but in the Cautionary Tales podcast by Tim Harford a guest once explained that cars are too safe. Through the years we blamed cars for not being safe when people get hurt but few alterations were made to our behaviour if you campagne it to the advances they’ve made in car safety. If imminent death would follow everytime we made a mistake people would be more careful. That’s how I feel about the roads in Wales. The lack of oversight made me be more cautious. That and the fact that I normally drive at the other side of the road.

        • lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          The general concept you’re describing is called Risk Compensation. It feels intuitively correct, but in whatever context it’s been studied in almost all cases it turns out that the safety feature is actually better overall. Some people might be a bit riskier knowing about the safety net, but not enough to counteract the safety improvement.

          Also - in the UK - road deaths go down over time, while miles driven goes up. Driving is getting safer. Cars are part of that, but so is road nd signal design and driver training.

          • Piers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s so much safer to have an accident in a modern car than one from even just a few decades ago. There’s no amount of better-than-what-we-have levels of driver awareness that can make up that gap.

          • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually a positive correlation has been found between the amount of roadway lighting and car accidents. More streetlights cause more crashes.

        • Robertej92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I drive a little Skoda so I’m very cautious on those little roads, don’t have the same feeling of safety as the great big SUVs that barrel along

      • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rural Scotland has a lot of single-track roads. One lane for two directions, 50mph speed limit, with pull-offs every few hundred feet so cars can stop and let others pass. FUN™.

    • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, this is a weird hypothetical, but if the world had been overcast for the last thousand years, and then suddenly there was sometimes just a completely blinding light in the sky that you sometimes have to drive straight toward, it would be chaos.

      Before COVID I imagined that the death toll would be so high that most roads would be shut down until technology had been developed and distributed so that you could never be blinded by the sun while driving. (Not just a flip down sun visor, but something like an LCD screen front windshield with head tracking that automatically blocks just the sun from your view).

      Now I know how quickly and easily people become acquainted with mass death.

      Now I imagine there wouldn’t even be a new driver’s test required that requires you to demonstrate that you can safely drive into the sunset.

      Just “We recommend, but don’t require, that you have a sun visor in your car when using public roads.”