I really want to switch to Linux, up to this point there were two things keeping me on Windows, gaming and work.

Gaming nowadays is a lot easier than a couple of years ago thanks to Valve and Proton, so that’s not a problem anymore; with the other one I don’t know if I can make something work enough and that’s why I’m asking here.

I work as a fullstack software developer with windows products I don’t fear for the frontend part because typescript, angular, react, … those I know I can run on linux with no problem on VS Code; for backend thought: dot.net, visual studio, sql server, … I think there is no Visual Studio for Linux and I don’t know if I can run & debug .net 8 applications on a linux machine? I can use docker for things like databases. Does anybody else has a similar scenario and things that had to overcame? Tips, problems that I may not see now before making the switch, and solutions to my current problems are welcome

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Instead of trying to run heavy and complex apps on an OS that were never designed for, use Windows for work, and then use gaming and your personal life on Linux. Another thing you can do is switch the kind of programming you do, so it’s more linux-related, so overtime, you can only have Linux machines. But for the time being, if you’re doing windows programming, use a windows machine for work.

    • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This sounds like the most reasonable answer here in this thread. I couldn’t have said it better.

      Preferences don’t matter if you get paid for it. If your job demands working with software designed for Windows, then use Windows. If you don’t do that, you have to find workarounds that cost time and therefore money, both if you are self employed or have to work for a company.
      Either you, or your boss, won’t be happy long term.

      If you like Linux more, then use it in your free time, or maybe consider switching your orientation for development to that platform.

      Same for development for Apple stuff (e.g. iPhone apps). Then you’re stuck with MacOS too. Or if you have to use certain CAD or Adobe software, then you’re stuck on Windows/ Mac too.

      Software availability is great on Linux, and today, you can get most of the stuff working on it, even if it isn’t designed for that. But is it worth it that time and effort? For me, it wouldn’t.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s because you do not understand the philosophy. We are not using GNU/Linux because it is easier, we’re using them out of idealism. In my opinion, it is worth sacrificing some comfort for the thing you believe in. And ultimately, every GNU/Linux user also leads to an increase in freedom for all the others, even the Windows or OS X evangelists profit from the hard work and lobbyism of the Linux community and the Free Software Foundation.

        • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Honesty? Nowadays Linux is just easier for me.

          Sometimes you forget that a lot of tools you are use to have in Linux don’t even exist on Windows (like watch and cut). On Windows there are some problems you don’t even have to deal with on Unix-like systems.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m actually using it because it’s easier. I do hobby programming, and I like having every utility I would ever need related to that just one command away. Need a hex editor? It’s in the repository. Need a calculator that can convert binary to decimal? Also in the repository. IDEs/plugins/compilers? Repository.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    .NET is now fully cross platform. you can absolutely run and debug applications on linux as you would in windows.

    However Visual Studio IDE is windows only (theres a mac version but isn’t the same).

    You can use vscode + .net development pack.

    Personally I use Jetbrains rider (for home and work)

    SQL Server has a linux version I believe, but its been years since Ive done an install (for development I run sql server in a container)

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      .NET is now fully cross platform. you can absolutely run and debug applications on linux as you would in windows.

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this limited to just console apps - as in you can’t yet run GUI apps, unless you’re using a cross-platform toolkit like Avalonia, or it’s a WinForms app running under Mono?

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    For the work part in particular, you may find that a virtual machine will get the job done pretty well. With modern CPUs there’s basically no overhead, so it’s often easier to just run the OS you need in a VM.

    You can just run it in the background, run your .NET and SQL server and stuff, possibly VSCode remote into it. PowerShell over SSH. If you need to run a GUI application, you can just RDP into it. FreeRDP has a cool feature where it can RDP a single application so it pops up as any other app on the host. Works great when you just need the database’s GUI or whatever.

    With virtio drivers and everything, it will be essentially as fast as if native. GUI will be slow because of software rendering, but the point is to use it as a server and only use the GUI as necessary, and for server stuff RDP isn’t too bad given it’s basically localhost network.

    There’s also the fun but painful world of VFIO and passing through a real GPU into the VM and feeding back the video to the host with Looking Glass. It’s so good you can game on that (anticheat still won’t work though, they don’t like VMs), so if RDP bothers you that’s an option. Although in my experience, Visual Studio is just as slow and buggy natively, so I wouldn’t bother and just RDP.

    If you add virtiofs to the mix, in theory you can share the code folder and use VSCode on the host and compile on the guest, or even compile on the host and run on the guest. Or send compile commands to Windows over SSH from VSCode. I have my entire Steam library (and Proton containers) on virtiofs and it works perfectly, so I have to imagine a code project should work nicely as well.

    Virtual machines are an awesome tool. There’s also the benefit of keeping all the work stuff in a big isolated container. If you have multiple projects you can make multiple VMs and not worry about one project needing version X and the other version Y of whatever.

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      And this is why I didn’t comment. I knew someone had already suggested the VM way. This is the best way to keep your stuff separate from work related.

      • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t like VMs because I need to allocate memory upfront for it, and considering it’s a Windows VM and depending on the dev work you’re doing on it you might need to give it 10Gb+.

        If it’s at all possible for OP I’d recommend getting a separate physical workstation and then just remoting into it with your Linux machine, if you use VSCode the process is pretty much seamless, you use VSCode from your Linux machine normally while all the work is being done on the remote machine.

          • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not sure what you mean exactly. The Windows workstation machine could be accessed remotely from anywhere. I mean sure you’re gonna have to hook it up to a monitor to set it up but after that you shouldn’t have to access it directly, at least not often.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Has Virtiofs matured lately into something that can be used day-to-day? I ask because I think the virtio stuff will be better for Windows virtualisation in the long-term, especially when VMware’s future is not certain, but I heard folder-sharing on Windows guests was pretty bad from Lemmy recently, and a few years ago I tried it and yeah, I have to agree.

    • Enoril@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Exactly what i did. Help also to not mix work and private life by having 2 distinct VM: one with ArchLinux for Gaming/Private apps, one with win10 for work

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s even nice to subdivide some activities. I have a disposable one for running sketchy stuff, two for gaming (Arch and Windows), a few work ones, a few dev ones.

        They’re just so cheap to run these days, I always have one or two running at all times.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just wanted to add that no one should ever NOT be using a vm as their dev machine.

  • bruce965@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yes, you can develop in .NET on VSCode and the debugger works on Linux too.

    There is a Docker version of SQL Server which funnily enough is equivalent to the enterprise version (rather than limited like SQL Express). You can use it for free as long as it’s for development purposes only.

    There is no SQL Management Studio though.

    One option would be to use PostgreSQL instead. Entity Framework makes it almost free to replace the database anyways (unless you are doing some db-specific things).

    There are some other minor annoyances or missing features, it might bother you; but depending on how you are used to work, you might not even notice. But, hey! you are on Linux now, you get all the benefits of a UNIX operating system, it will be worth it for sure, right? (Yes, imho)


    As for gaming, I only do light gaming so I probably don’t count. I use Heroic Launcher and it works wonderfully out of the box 50% of the time, the remaining 50% you can probably make it work as good as on Windows if you are persistent enough.

    Oh, and sometimes some games run better on Linux than on Windows, but I would say most of the time they run a bit worse.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    I am a dotnet dev using Linux as my primary OS. Dotnet core fully works on Linux now, there’s a native Linux dotnet cli that works almost identically to the windows one

    SQL server I think has been able to run on Linux for a while anyway

    You’ll have to learn to live without full fat visual studio but honestly you’re better without it anyway it just stops you from learning the stuff you really ought to know by doing it all for you

    VSCode is a pretty good replacement and actually nicer to use if you know what you’re doing, neovim if you want to end up spending all your time configuring it (said as a neovim user)

    Gaming is absolutely not an issue unless you play certain competitive games with weird anticheat (valorant for example)

    As others have mentioned, docker and VMs exist if you have a reasonably powerful machine so nothing should be completely inaccessible to you anyway, on the windows machine I have to use at work I ironically do most of my dotnet dev on a Linux VM anyway

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        True, not free though and I think IDEs like visual studio proper abstract things away that you should probably have some understanding of

  • om1k@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    VSCode or JetBrains Rider are good options for .net development, both available on Linux.

  • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m also a C# dev and I have been using Linux for years now.

    VS Code was pretty much unusable in the beginning when compared to VS. However, nowadays VS Code is very capable at syntax highlighting and debugging.

    There is no support for WPF and Forms applications on Linux, since I mostly write web and console applications I don’t mind running a Windows VM for those few exceptions. There is also no support for Maui applications but as things are going right now it seems to not be going anywhere anyway.

    Since we mostly deploy to Linux servers nowadays anyway it has actually made my job easier since I can run Docker without having to fiddle with it every day like I had to on Windows.

  • Panda@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    I use Jetbrains Rider on Linux which runs just fine. It takes some setting up to install .NET but it didn’t take me too long. Except for pre-release versions, that might take more trial and error.

    Overall I’m pretty satisfied with the switch to Linux and I haven’t had any major issues. Not with video games, either. Protondb.com is a good website to see what games do and don’t work on Linux and you may need to add launch options to get specific games to work or switch to a specific version of Proton.

    It’s up to you to decide if it’s worth it for you or not. You could try a dual boot setup first.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Even if you can run your .net code on linux, it’s better for you to run on the actual platform you’ll be deploying to. You could dual boot just for work (that’s what I do) or try running in a VM, but I assume your work is hard enough without generating new friction.

  • poinck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you don’t play the latest game titles with DRM you should be good to go on Linux: Steam runs great in a flatpak sandbox.

    I don’t know how compatible mono is with dotnet. Interestingly, some game launchers need it and protontricks can handle many issues. Have look at protondb. Back to work: Someone needs to confirm whether MSSQL server can be run on Linux, but I am almost sure that you won’t be able to run the gui of it. But you can connect to it using DBeaver (Java-based) or a VSCode plugin. As for C# development on Linux, I don’t know.

    I wish I could switch to Linux at work, too, but standardization of work environments seems to be the problem. I would even consider Ubuntu 22.04 LTS if my employer woul allow it. Last time I asked, time was the real reason. Time savings in the long run, currently don’t matter. I will ask later and if they still tell me, it’s too risky, I will look elsewhere.

    Our dev setup doesn’t even have the constraints you have for your work. It is all docker-based with Ubuntu Linux containers. It would run faster on Linux even if we could switch to WSL2. And I would argue, that Linux is more standardized than Windows.

    I hope you get your stuff running on Linux; market share needs to go up so that all the managers don’t fear it. (:

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      A lot of times the DRM issues can be fixed by using a cracked version. The real problem is the games that force the rootkit based anti cheats that really just make the cheaters switch to hardware based cheats instead of stopping them.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I never thought I’d say this but… in your case, for work at least I would actually stick to Windows! It looks like most of your tools are from Microsoft and that the environment they will normally run on is Windows. It seems most pragmatic to stay there.

    For gaming though (as I’ve argue few times and can be seen from my history), Proton works well, even for AAA games, unsupported (officially) games and VR. ProtonDB helps you to quickly assess if that’s the case for your specific games.

    Anyway, what I would suggest though is step back, i.e WHY do you want to step away from Windows. If it’s technical then “just” dual boot and properly separating fun from work might be sufficient. If it’s more moral and ethical, then earning money from tools that are NOT from Microsoft to gradually decouple, remove the dependency on it, seems like the “right” thing to do.

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Get a second drive and install Linux on it. You can then flick between the two on boot. I’ve done this and now booting into Arch more than Windows. I’ll still boot into Windows for reasons but Arch is my main OS now.

  • Procapra [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tips for switching to linux:

    1. Determine if your hardware will play nice with linux. If you have Broadcom or Realtek wifi/bluetooth be aware that linux doesn’t always have great drivers for those. Nvidia gpus don’t always play nice with wayland.

    2. Certain anti-cheats for games just don’t work on linux.

    3. (might not apply to you since you’re in IT) Try to avoid using obscure linux distros or bleeding edge distros like Arch. You’ll run into issues and not many people will be able to help. Debian, Fedora, and Ubuntu seem to be the popular distros rn for most people.

    • 1boiledpotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t agree with the 3rd take. I used both Debian and Arch based systems. Both break equally often (quite rarely), but when smth breaks in a Debian based system there’s little support or help, while on Arch everyone is willing to help you and you have Arch wiki, which is in a league of its own. Also thanks to AUR, there so much more software available out of the box on Arch

      • swab148@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m actually switching my mom over to Manjaro today specifically because of the AUR. The reason she hadn’t switched before was a very niche embroidery program that we were both convinced would be a Windows exclusive, then two days ago I found out that someone had packaged it earlier this year!

    • bleepbloopbop [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You’ll run into issues and not many people will be able to help. Debian, Fedora, and Ubuntu seem to be the popular distros rn for most people.

      Agree with the broader conclusion that a first time linux user should probably avoid gentoo, arch, whatever, but its not because nobody will be able to help you, more just that the expected level of polish is a bit less.

      It isn’t considered a huge inconvenience to have to use the CLI or edit a config file by arch users, but for ubuntu especially they are more bent on building something that “just works” for most people (with the tradeoff being it’s a commercially exploited product, and the innards of GNOME and the like tend to be more of a black box and less tweakable than say, a tiling WM)

      But if you do want to dive in and learn how more of the internals work and how to configure things at a lower level, you will find a lot of help with issues, and very detailed documentation for a lot more things in Arch, vs Ubuntu. I find the ubuntu community online to be sort of a middle ground between the detailed technical help I’ve gotten from Arch communities, and the “here’s some magic steps that worked for me, no idea why” type of thing that is prevalent on windows support communities.

      Which isn’t to say ubuntu people aren’t helpful, but the critical mass of users isn’t the only thing that matters, it also helps if the users are knowledgeable, and friendly (some arch people fail at this, though I’ve lucked out and really not had any bad experiences)

      • Procapra [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I meant more that, when it comes to newer bleeding edge software, some of the bugs introduced won’t be as well recorded and people won’t know exactly how to remedy your specific problem. Whereas with debian/ubuntu or fedora, often its as simple as typing whatever problem you’re having into a search engine, plugging some junk into the terminal, and it fixing the problem 90% of the time.

        But I agree with your comment overall so have my upvote! :)

  • Metju@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fellow .NET dev here, switched to Linux for side-gigs recently.

    In general, the experience is a lot better than Windows / WSL. Some general remarks on the setup (relevant mostly for Debian-based distros, so YMMV):

    • Rider / VSCode suggestion is spot on; go with the former if you have cash to spare and you’re fine with snaps, otherwise - DevKit can do DevKit things (with the only problem here being lack of .dcproj support in VSCode; can be ignored with proper integration test setup).
    • Containerization of DBMS: by all means, go for it if you have the resources to spare.
    • Possible gotchas:
      • If you’re going to use MS apt feed for .NET runtime / SDK, set up apt preferences to point to their feed for dotnet packages. Otherwise, you’re in for a bad time when running updates.
      • Docker: personally, I recommend Rancher Desktop for this purpose, as Docker Desktop on Windows left a bad taste in my mouth. If you’re fine with the latter, it’s up to your own preferences then.
      • Test containers: if you do use it with anything else than standard, bare-bones Docker setup, you’ll need a custom config; stumbled upon that the first time I tried running integration tests.