• rjh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s not the background radiation that worries people, it’s the risk of a Fukushima-type incident.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ehhhh, those are the ancient light water designs. Fuck light water, even though it’s actually pretty safe. Advanced sodium reactors are where it’s at. One loop is molten salt and nuclear fuel. The salt makes it less dense so it can’t melt down like a traditional reactor. A second loop of salt is what steals heat from the fuel, which loops around to a water boiler further away. In essence, it’s airgapped. While corrosion can be an issue, the lack of water in the salt loops helps a ton.

      Solar towers with molten salt generators also work in the same way. The salts are molten and continue pumping out power for 12 hours after the sun has set, which makes them an excellent source of power for cities :)

      I’d live next to a nuclear plant any day of the week! Especially if the homes are less expensive because of it :D

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        While the modern technology is relatively safe, it’s not a technical issue with the reactor design. It’s a trust issue with the humans, particularly for-profit companies, that operate it.

    • max@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And even then, despite the catastrophe it was, it only had 1 death attributed to it.

      • rjh@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        TIL. That’s a good point. 20k deaths due to the earthquake but only 1 due to the power plant itself.