• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not android

    Which part of “If Flatpak adopts parts of Android’s security system” don’t you understand? Do you need help with conditionals in the English language?

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Flatpak already has an established security model.

      Your statement is pointless and you are rude.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Flatpak already has an established security model.

        You are not a Flatpak core developer, so you have absolutely no idea whether they decide if different applications from the same vendor will at some point be allowed to access each others data.

        Your statement is pointless

        It’s not pointless to think about possible future decisions a crucial piece of software might have to make. I also replied to a question from OP, so it’s not your decision what is pointless and what isn’t anyway.

        and you are rude.

        If you think that being an uninvited “But actually” comment isn’t rude, you have a skewed sense of reality. I was answering a question from OP, not yours. You’re the one who engaged with that attitude. Look in the mirror before making accusations.

        Edit: Blocking you now. Not engaging with a brat any longer.