like I went to taco bell and they didn’t even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don’t get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

  • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not technically a “law”…

    “The shareholder wealth maximization doctrine requires public corporations to pursue a single purpose to the exclusion of all others: increase the wealth of shareholders by increasing the value of their shares. However, a company should be committed to enhance shareholder value and comply with all regulations and laws that govern shareholder’s rights.”

    The" however… " part is largely ignored, except for when it benefits shareholders.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “however” part you quoted explicitly mentions following the rights of shareholders. From what you described, there’s literally nothing else in the doctrine to ignore.

      • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, your right. I guess I got to the part where it said “comply with regulations and laws” and laughed through the rest.