![](https://media.kbin.social/media/9d/7f/9d7fc372a92e1ddc84de31485b415f7f8d3048a6f636bd7112ededd996e67fe3.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
Buuuut aren’t they still kind of pushing the chat control proposal? Feels they’re going both forward and backward
She/They • 19 • HUGE nerd lol • ND
Matrix: @cybercatbytes:matrix.org
Discord: cybercatbytes
(Best viewed on original instance)
Buuuut aren’t they still kind of pushing the chat control proposal? Feels they’re going both forward and backward
I completely agree
I feel like cybersecurity should specifically be addressed in terms of it though; The responsibilities & all that get even more insane and I’ve noticed my friends working in the field are especially stressed out
This, the very first sentence of the article describes social media as an accelerant rather than a root cause too
It’s so painfully obvious that the article was written to push a personal agenda rather than objectively address the topic
Mozilla’s response brings it up along with other things that’d prolly get messed up too
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/852#issuecomment-1648820747
“The WEI experiment is part of a larger goal to keep the web safe and open” I’m guessing the openness they’re referring to doesn’t apply to everyone given that their proposal would likely negatively affect assistive technologies a lot of disabled people rely on? Haven’t seen them address that
I’m sorry to hear that and I hope you’re ok