I thought it meant sprinkling sugar on them and eating them as an after dinner treat
I thought it meant sprinkling sugar on them and eating them as an after dinner treat
maybe?, if we accept the mountains of dead human babies the research would inevitably produce.
Not a chance, that has to be mathematically impossible. I can’t see how such a thing wouldn’t break entropy.
to be fair, thats much more a failure of road infrastructure than it is of google, even if it could have done better.
Why not both?
in my opinion you are taking a serious breach of personal freedom far too lightly.
“check it out” does not involve handcuffs.
if an Italian died every time “an italian dies” Italy’s population would be in the negatives by now.
it also sees your mouse movements on your way to that box.
I doubt there’s much correlation either way
PFAS are extremely inert, yet they wreak all kinds of havoc in the bodies of humans and animals.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per-_and_polyfluoroalkyl_substances
Scientists thought, as you say, that them being chemically inert means they wont be dangerous to living creatures. Sadly they were proven wrong on that.
this is the year of the linux desktop after all
who mentioned a problem?
…use of AI tools to…
yeah, no thx.
“No right” to express confusion? Lol.
Firefox is a good example
E10 has an energy density of 108,608 BTU/gal and E15 has an energy density of 106,814 BTU/gal.
source: http://www.airimprovement.com/reports/national-e15-analysis-final.pdf
This gives us tha the 88 octane has 106.8/108.6 ≈ 0.983 times the energy density of the 87.
1-0.983 = 0.017
The correct number is that the 88 needs to be 1.7% cheaper than 87 to give equivalent distance per dollar.
LLMs are fantastic tech, good at many things. Math is not one of those things.
okay so I had AI do the math for me.
“I drove a screw with a hammer”
it has software for the temp control and such
specifically: https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS