Alternative take: Piracy is, at worst, morally neutral, and does not have a significant adverse effect on the profits of the people who produce media.
Alternative take: Piracy is, at worst, morally neutral, and does not have a significant adverse effect on the profits of the people who produce media.
It’s so cute!
Paying for her cab fare home sounds reasonably polite.
Oh, that person was definitely insulting people and accusing them of addiction, and it wasn’t cool at all. I just think the whole “let people enjoy things” retort is ridiculous and overdone.
I see. My apologies for misunderstanding you.
More clarification would be helpful, I agree.
the same way each other digital storefront does
I’m not sure if I’m understanding you correctly, but “everyone else is doing evil too” is not an incredibly effective defense against doing evil.
Rights are not a purely legal concept. You can have rights that are not codified by law.
How about letting people enjoy things?
How is this person’s criticism preventing you from enjoying things?
I bet the Deck has a lot to do with this.
I agree, human.
I append “site:Reddit.com” (I know, I know) to basically every search I perform. It’s the only reliable way at this point to see things written genuinely by real people.
To be honest, I would be really tempted to do this if I could afford it and guarantee that it would kickstart a YouTube career.
How would that possibly work?
Pay $44 billion for a brand
Literally destroy the brand
This is more baffling than accidentally destroying the brand, like he’s been doing.
We oughtta arrest the people who pave roads because human traffickers use them to commit crimes.
I don’t mean evidence for their political convictions, I mean that they chose .ml specifically because it could stand for Marx and Lenin.
This sounds like a really dumb rumor. Do you have evidence?
Do you believe it’s the only thing that’s worked so far, or the only thing that could ever possibly work?
I’m done with that place.