Debian.

I can’t stand her voice.

Now post one without the shirt to be distro-agnostic.

Arch never breaks.

But the arch users told me it never breaks, could they have lied to me?

You don’t need timeshift because arch never breaks.

Source: arch users

Sure, go ahead, use licenses that let Apple steal everything later.

tldr: Normies shouldn’t be allowed to use computers.

Without the 1:1 compatibility, it makes me wonder if there’s much use case for this over CentOS Stream while it lasts.

Fixed that for you. IBM Hat is just bidding its time, doing damage control, waiting for their shills to become louder than their haters, then CentOS Stream will die.

It didn’t spew an error message, it failed completely silently. I was completely puzzled and wasted a day trying to figure out why I couldn’t overlay a certain package.

Not 100%, it’s not very hard to push packages to Flathub.

Canonical is a disgrace.

You probably didn’t notice, but you couldn’t install anything or update, rpm-ostree was broken.

Unless you fixed it manually, sure, there’s an argument to be had that way.

but maybe somebody knows a clever way to handle this?

backups

Last year Silverblue spent a whole month broken, the developers have no concept of rolling back bad updates.

I don’t stow or anything difficult anymore, it complicates things.

I just save everything in my gitlab account and then I manually create the links.

When a package is not working well, the distribution is said to be broken, at least for that package. This is the Debian definition.

The arch definition is “it’s not arch’s fault lmao”

He said “some of them”, meaning not all packages that broke were -git.

Compile it =D

You could also use Nix or those things that let you install AUR packages in Debian.

But some packages did

So Arch broke for you.