I’d never bother changing whatever default font the editor comes with and I don’t understand why anyone would care to

No, that’s a tankless job

He’s talking about ultrasonic-cleaning those little gold things people hang around their collar

My only pair of earbuds have a wire. The connector is usb-c and my phone has a jack. So I don’t even use the jack now

3.5 headphones that have volume controls and a pause/hang up button can’t seem to last a year. I tried 2 and they both lasted 3 months

Sure bud absolutely nothing wrong with your parenting

Why don’t my kids talk to me? Why am I dying alone?

Mark discovers hyperbola

If your goal is to get back scratches from the circlejerk don’t feel the need to participate lol

Cool, but there’s no shot any serious software company will want that shit under their brand

That’s definitely not what Google told me to do at the time in 2015

What you gonna repair it for? It’s not like it’s gonna work

Having to create .desktop files in god knows where for me to be able to right click -> “open with” my program of choice sure pushed me away

I don’t even know what they were thinking not letting you beowse for any executable file on disk

“The snippersnappers should focus on making the fax machine faster”, Biden reportedly said

This is not a good article

To know if an email is a scam I would check the domain of the link it’s sending, which this doesn’t provide

Also you shouldn’t trust the sender address of an email, you can spoof that

That’s cool, but I’m not making software for desktop linux until there’s one standard GUI api

How would it depend?

What the “no such thing as a free lunch” mentality does to a mf

Step up the reading comprehension please :)

It’s pretty funny having you state, re-state and re-re-state the exact same obvious things that everyone understands while not seeing that everyone gets that, that you’re missing the point, and that you’re yelling in a hole

Why do you keep going?

Are you that painfully unconvincing in real life like cmon

Step it up

Step up the reading comprehension please :)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that— (1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is obscene; or (2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.

You’re really mad that a US based study is using the US definition of CSAM while also clearly stating the definition of CSAM they’re using, aren’t you?

Sure buddy, it’s a “false equivalence”, they’re totally stating it’s the same. It’s not just your reading comprehension