Size limitations? In git?

What is the average size of your source code files?

Normally you’d never run out of space in git unless you’re committing large binary files.

No one got what you really meant.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Yes. But SteamOS is immutable.

They mean when will Valve release an official Steam OS 3 ISO that we can install on our own PCs.

Wait till you learn about the other stuff about them.

This one is pretty comprehensive

https://drewdevault.com/2024/04/09/2024-04-09-FDO-conduct-enforcement.html

He was actually banned for condoning a toxic anti-trans culture on his Discord. Violating FreeDesktop’s code of conduct.

He also once said “I do believe there could be arguments to sway my opinion towards genocide.”

Also substack

Does this have something to do with the author being banned from freedesktop?

Ohh, I didn’t think of using that. Let me try it out and see if it works.

I use MO2 via SteamTinkerLaunch and IIRC it only installs version 2.4.4.

What Proton/Wine version did you test on?

Do versions newer than 2.4.4 work properly now? Last I checked (with proton 8.0) the only version that worked was 2.4.4. Newer versions would not load USVFS and your mods don’t get loaded.

Cool, I tried your launch options and it worked, though I have modified it a bit:

ENABLE_HDR_WSI=0 DXVK_HDR=1 gamescope -f -H 1440 --hdr-enabled --mangoapp -- %command%

Everything however had a slight blurriness and I wish FSR worked, however toggling FSR freezes the game. I never used FSR to begin with though.

gamescope-wsi_git

What is WSI exactly and what patches does this package of gamescope have?

It greatly depends on the applications.

Porting Windows exclusive games to Linux is a small step as well, but most developers don’t do it because they cannot justify the additional QA and debugging time required to port them over. Especially since Linux’s market share is small.

The reason Itanium failed was because the architecture was too different from x86 and porting x86 applications over required significant effort and was error prone.

For RISC-V to even get any serious attention from developers, I think they need to have appx 40-50% market share with OEMs alongside ARM. Otherwise, RISC-V will be seen as a niche architecture and developers would avoid porting their applications to it.

They’re not compatible

This is what concerns me. ARM could dominate the market because almost everyone would develop apps supporting it and leave RISC-V behind. It could become like Itanium vs AMD64 all over again.

I’d rather see what RISC-V has to offer.

I wish we held game developers to the same level of scrutiny.

Working in enterprise software development really hammers in the importance of unit tests and integration tests.

Hydra dominatus

WE MARCH FOR MACRAGGE