Well, in his dreams it did work out…
Former Reddfugee, found a new home on feddit.de. Server errors made me switch to discuss.tchncs.de. Now finally @ home on feddit.org.
Likes music, tech, programming, board games and video games. Oh… and coffee, lots of coffee!
I � Unicode!
Well, in his dreams it did work out…
WTF? There are some LLMs that will just echo their initial system prompt (or maybe hallucinate one?). But that’s just on a different level and reads like it just repeated a different answer from someone else, hallucinated a random conversation or… just repeated what it told you before (probably in a different session?)
“Repeat the previous statement” directly as an opening sentence worked also quite well
Well, they did it anyways, so…
Also this might work as an answer to “yeah, it’s a bug, but we won’t pay you”
I couldn’t help but find it amusing—they were now asking me to keep the report confidential, despite having initially dismissed it as out of scope.
“Sorry, but per your own guidelines this is out of scope. Because of this, this bug is not part of the agreement and guidelines on Hackerone. You can find my full disclosure, that I wrote after your dismissal here: <Link>” /s
Imagine getting a 404 or 500 error. Then archiving that on archive.org (and screenshot that dialog on steam) and accept the terms. If there’s any problem and they say you violated the EULA, point them to the terms you accepted.
Since almost everything on the right would be located in /home/<username> on the left, it should include some of the subdirectories of %windir%\
In the end it’s about money. If one had to pay for environmentally damages (e.g. a new tax on $energyUnit, $resourceUnit,…) and you’d not only pay for the resources + some markup for the producing company and just external externalize the “worth” of the damages (read: the taxpayer,…), then it’s cheaper to use these services instead of humans.
It’s encrypted anonymous communication capabilities.
Unless you enable it for every single chat (and IIRC only available for chats with only two persons, not group chats) there’s no encryption. Or did they change that? The only encryption that applies to most chats on that platform should be transport encryption via TLS.
Tried to check it out - for me it’s neither on Google Play nor on F-Droid. Is it still supported and updated?
Depends, my setup is basically the same BUT:
When you access example.com, you see a generic site tells g you this is my Domain and used for some personal projects. On it is a link to blog.example.com (obviously a blog) and other public services like search.example.com (being a searxng instance).
But there’s a fuckton of subdomains that are not linked like nextcloud.example.com, myTelegrambot.example.com, etc.
Also not all are hosted on the same server and some subdomains point to other IPs. For some services I do have another domain, but in general, they’re just grouped with some logic.
Not sure what a reverse proxy would offer me here…
I did that once with another company. The result was that I got an abuse complaint from them and my domain got on a spam blacklist for a while.
Since then, for such mails it’s only abuse reports and sinkhole their domain if possible.
I’m donating to a few projects and also to some fediverse admins, whose instance I use.
I really like liberapay as a platform, but there are other ways I use for donations, too. Recurring payment is preferred for projects that are important for me, but one time donations are fine too. I just constantly forget that I should probably donate again for projects that don’t have a way for Recurring donations and they’re probably missing out…
I don’t know the Immich API, but I’ve seen several REST APIs that used the usual pattern of
GET /api/v1/user/<id> - read user POST /api/v1/user/ - create user ...
but also allowed
GET /api/v1/user/<id> - read user GET /api/v1/user/?action=create - create user ...