Not explicitly
You said it “mentions … only that proton will”. Now you’re saying it doesn’t mention proton.
How do you think it does that? Through proton.
The issue is not about how games might be able to run but about what you wrote in your comment.
mentions … only that proton will be able to properly translate for them
Where is that mentioned?
free software communities
TheLinuxExperiment on YouTube
LOL
Probably the most egregious behaviour is declaring different terms and conditions for sales and pre-orders after a person has handed over their money, particularly changing the terms around refunds. Literal Vader “pray I do not alter it any further”. And illegal. Refunds in general have been a nightmare for customers with many making a complaint to the Attorney General of California which seems to have been the only way to get money back.
Check r/purism on Reddit if you want to see lots of examples of their shady behaviour.
Also: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Zlatan-Todoric-Interview
And: https://jaylittle.com/post/view/2019/10/the-sad-saga-of-purism-and-the-librem-5-part-1
deleted by creator
If you ask in earnest, you’ll get good responses.
This is not the case. Every time I’ve asked in earnest, I’ve faced mobs of lunatics.
This is essentially just about gitlab privileges. It seems like you’re making a big deal about nothing. Calling a particular category of privilege holders a “team” seems excessive, possibly even deluded. Likewise, describing the collection of different gitlab privilege roles as an “organisational structure” seems silly.
You tell us; you haven’t improved the basic stuff so you have the answer already in your own behaviour.
Evangelical in that it’s documented as a theory & a paper for the concepts you can read about?
No, evangelical as in needing to tell people about it, even when they have no interest.
Have you worked in a distributed team sharing just patches over email?
No.
The Patch Theory
The way you write about this seems very evangelical.
patches, without depending patches that would cause a conflict, should commute
get stuck in their rebases/pulls
I use git every day and I don’t recall patch ordering ever being a problem.
I think it’s a little much to expect people to always qualify ‘Free as in beer’ anytime they ever use the word free in a monetary sense in a Linux community.
That seems really odd to me. I don’t expect people to qualify use of the word free in a montery sense in a Linux community, I expect people to avoid using the word free in a monetary sense entirely. And it doesn’t seem a little much, it seems blindingly obvious if one’s goal is to communicate effectively.
The two big contenders are Darcs … Darcs … has some performance issues (where some of the old perf issues are fixed, some remain)
If Darcs has performance issues, how is it better than git?
Git is not the best DVCS
What would you suggest is a better DVCS than git?
I would’ve thought … would’ve made that much obvious.
Using the word “free” to refer to proprietary games in a GNU/Linux context is a huge indicator of a lack of awareness. I wouldn’t look further.
finding out what software licence each and every title used, along with a direct link to the source code
FYI, the page you linked to isn’t publicly accessible. When I try to look, Reddit demands that I log in and doesn’t present the page content.
Windows 2000 was a good operating system by any measure
ROFL
It is a fact.
LOL
Jesus grow up