Thank you! :-)

The content posted here has no obvious license. I wonder if an administrator could just put any license of his choice on your posts.

I wonder why I don’t pay for Lemmy.

bsky-social-yfjde-fanxw first one gets it

Again, I’m talking about the server part here, and there is a lot preventing a server to be both a web and a mail server.

You understand that web servers (listening on a web server port) and mail servers (listening on one or more mail server ports, possibly on the same computer) are entirely different technologies?

JMAP sounds interesting indeed, but as far as I understand, there is an underwhelming number of clients that speak it?

A website is the response a web server sends on a web port to a web browser. SMTP on port 80/443 won’t work well, but please try.

If you try it, report back. ;-) My current setup is mostly OpenSMTPD & Dovecot, but I’m open for good reasons to move away.

Websites do not have the functionality to connect to mail servers. These are different protocols.

For mail server infrastructure, Stalwart is said to be pretty good. I haven’t had a chance to try it yet.

I probably said “Windows” once too often (= once).

Linux is probably not the wisest choice for gaming - that would still be Windows. Anyway, the distribution does not matter that much. You can install most Linux and cross-platform software on most distributions. Do not choose your system because of what comes as the default desktop, default package set et cetera. Try a few ones. Read some reviews.

deleted by creator

nvi, I guess.

WordPerfect is still quite awesome, given that it has Reveal Codes. However, the older I am, the more I grow to like WordStar (and its free clone).

Mostly, mg.

I did. TinyMCE is still less comfy to use in my opinion. Of course, that’s probably a matter of taste. Also, I wonder when Automattic will stop supporting it.

How would a hacker even notice the difference between a Linux server and.a Linux desktop? Those are the same thing.

Gee, I wonder whether it’s possible to have zero-day exploits on Linux and 7-Zip.

It depends. The RAR5 format used by newer WinRAR versions (the “old” one is still supported just well) can have smaller archives than 7z, but the opposite is also true. Still, yes, WinRAR is in my experience faster and more stable.

(Note that “as small as possible” is not usually the most relevant point. The best compression is currently reached with the ZPAQ format, but using it with maximum compression settings is painfully slow.)